Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Xomnia (4.3/5) edges ahead of Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) overall. Xomnia is the better choice for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount.. Lasting Dynamics is the stronger option for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Xomnia | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2015 |
| HQ | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain |
| Team size | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount. | Buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, AWS | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Manufacturing, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Technology & SaaS | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics: overview
Xomnia
Xomnia is a data and AI consultancy founded in 2013 and headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, with roughly 85 employees before its June 2025 acquisition of Aurai (a 50-person data and AI team founded by Lars Kieftenburg), bringing its combined headcount to 135+ specialists. It serves manufacturing, finance, telecommunications, energy, and government clients across Northwest Europe, positioning itself explicitly as the region's leading data and AI consultancy. As a Dutch company, all client engagements sit fully within EU jurisdiction and GDPR by default.
Lasting Dynamics
Lasting Dynamics is an award-winning software development company founded in 2015 by Michele Cimmino, with a core operational hub in Naples, Italy and registered headquarters in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, plus an office in Stavanger, Norway. Its roughly 30–36 person team delivers custom software, AI solutions, SaaS platforms, and mobile applications for clients in 30+ countries. As a Spanish/Italian EU entity, it offers a genuinely Southern European delivery option, distinct from the Poland-heavy cluster of firms on this list.
Services and capabilities: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
| Capability | Xomnia | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
| Framework / platform | Xomnia | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
| Criterion | Xomnia | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
| Dimension | Xomnia | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Manufacturing, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Government or energy-sector clients needing a Northwest-Europe-based AI consultancy, Manufacturing or telecom enterprises wanting data pipeline work bundled with agentic AI | Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster, Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics: pros and cons
| Xomnia | |
|---|---|
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (Netherlands), with all engagements sitting inside GDPR jurisdiction by default |
| + | 135+ specialists post-acquisition gives it meaningful bench depth for a boutique-scale firm |
| + | Named delivery experience across manufacturing, finance, telecom, energy, and government |
| + | Over a decade of data and AI consultancy history since 2013 |
| - | Recent acquisition (2025) means combined-team integration is still relatively new |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Agentic AI is one part of a broader data-and-AI consultancy practice, not the sole focus |
| Lasting Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Southern European (Spain/Italy) EU delivery base, distinct jurisdiction from the Poland-heavy cluster on this list |
| + | Over a decade of award-winning software development history since 2015 |
| + | Client base spans 30+ countries despite a compact team |
| + | Additional Norwegian office extends its European footprint further north |
| - | Small team (roughly 30–36 people) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Reported headquarters location varies by source (Las Palmas vs. Naples), worth confirming contracting entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
Who should choose Xomnia?
Xomnia is the right choice for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount..
A 2025 acquisition (Aurai) grew its specialist headcount to 135+, positioning it as Northwest Europe's leading data and AI consultancy.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Technology & SaaS.
Who should choose Lasting Dynamics?
Lasting Dynamics is the right choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Xomnia |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Xomnia |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Xomnia (Not published) vs Lasting Dynamics (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Xomnia |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
| Use case | Xomnia fit | Lasting Dynamics fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government or energy-sector clients needing a Northwest-Europe-based AI consultancy | Strong | Limited | Xomnia |
| Manufacturing or telecom enterprises wanting data pipeline work bundled with agentic AI | Strong | Limited | Xomnia |
| Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | Limited | Strong | Lasting Dynamics |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics
Xomnia (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A 2025 acquisition (Aurai) grew its specialist headcount to 135+, positioning it as Northwest Europe's leading data and AI consultancy.. It is best for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount..
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) is the better choice when buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. If your situation matches those criteria, Lasting Dynamics is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Xomnia vs Lasting Dynamics FAQ
Is Xomnia better than Lasting Dynamics?
Xomnia (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Xomnia is better for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount.. Lasting Dynamics is better for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
How do Xomnia and Lasting Dynamics differ in pricing?
Xomnia uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Lasting Dynamics uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Xomnia or Lasting Dynamics?
Xomnia is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Xomnia and Lasting Dynamics?
Xomnia's primary differentiator is: a 2025 acquisition (aurai) grew its specialist headcount to 135+, positioning it as northwest europe's leading data and ai consultancy.. Lasting Dynamics's primary differentiator is: a genuinely southern european (spain/italy) delivery base, an alternative eu jurisdiction to the poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Manufacturing, Financial Services vs Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.