Best AI Agent Development Companies in Europe

Xomnia vs Belitsoft: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: August 2026

Quick verdict

Xomnia (4.3/5) edges ahead of Belitsoft (3.7/5) overall. Xomnia is the better choice for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount.. Belitsoft is the stronger option for european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Xomnia vs Belitsoft: head-to-head summary

Criterion Xomnia Belitsoft
Founded 2013 2004
HQ Amsterdam, Netherlands Warsaw, Poland
Team size 51–200 51–400
Rating 4.3 / 5 3.7 / 5
Best for Northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount. European healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check.
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement Not published $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Python, LangChain, AWS Python, LangChain, AWS
Industries served Manufacturing, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Technology & SaaS Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS

Xomnia vs Belitsoft: overview

Xomnia

Xomnia is a data and AI consultancy founded in 2013 and headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, with roughly 85 employees before its June 2025 acquisition of Aurai (a 50-person data and AI team founded by Lars Kieftenburg), bringing its combined headcount to 135+ specialists. It serves manufacturing, finance, telecommunications, energy, and government clients across Northwest Europe, positioning itself explicitly as the region's leading data and AI consultancy. As a Dutch company, all client engagements sit fully within EU jurisdiction and GDPR by default.

Belitsoft

Belitsoft is a custom software development company founded in 2004 with headquarters in Warsaw, Poland and delivery teams distributed across Poland, Latvia, and Georgia, totaling roughly 130–400 developers, testers, and other specialists depending on the source. Its existing vertical experience in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech gives European buyers in those sectors a directly comparable reference base. Its Poland and Latvia offices sit within the EU; its Georgia office sits outside EU jurisdiction, worth confirming per-project data residency.

Services and capabilities: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Capability Xomnia Belitsoft
Multi-agent orchestration
RAG / knowledge integration
Workflow & systems integration
Coding agents
Monitoring & anomaly detection
Customer-facing agents

Tech stack comparison: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Framework / platform Xomnia Belitsoft
LangChain
LangGraph N/A N/A
AutoGen N/A N/A
LlamaIndex N/A N/A
OpenAI N/A N/A
Anthropic Claude N/A N/A
Pinecone N/A N/A
AWS
Azure
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Criterion Xomnia Belitsoft
Minimum engagement Not published $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Dimension Xomnia Belitsoft
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Manufacturing, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS
Best use cases Government or energy-sector clients needing a Northwest-Europe-based AI consultancy, Manufacturing or telecom enterprises wanting data pipeline work bundled with agentic AI European healthcare or fintech buyers wanting sector-matched reference contracts, E-learning platforms adding AI tutoring or advisory agents
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Xomnia vs Belitsoft: pros and cons

Xomnia
+ Fully EU-domiciled (Netherlands), with all engagements sitting inside GDPR jurisdiction by default
+ 135+ specialists post-acquisition gives it meaningful bench depth for a boutique-scale firm
+ Named delivery experience across manufacturing, finance, telecom, energy, and government
+ Over a decade of data and AI consultancy history since 2013
- Recent acquisition (2025) means combined-team integration is still relatively new
- Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting
- Agentic AI is one part of a broader data-and-AI consultancy practice, not the sole focus
Belitsoft
+ Two decades of vertical delivery experience in healthcare, fintech, and e-learning
+ Poland and Latvia delivery centers sit within the EU for data-residency purposes
+ Founded 2004 with continuous operating history
+ Existing sector expertise helps agentic work meet vertical-specific compliance and workflow needs
- Georgia delivery office sits outside EU jurisdiction — worth confirming which team works on a given project
- Reported employee counts vary widely across sources, worth confirming directly
- Agentic AI is a newer addition to a generalist custom-software practice

Who should choose Xomnia?

Xomnia is the right choice for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount..

A 2025 acquisition (Aurai) grew its specialist headcount to 135+, positioning it as Northwest Europe's leading data and AI consultancy.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Technology & SaaS.

Who should choose Belitsoft?

Belitsoft is the right choice for european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check..

Two decades of vertical delivery history in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech, with a mostly-EU (Poland, Latvia) delivery footprint.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS.

Decision matrix: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Xomnia
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Xomnia
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Xomnia (Not published) vs Belitsoft ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Xomnia
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Use case Xomnia fit Belitsoft fit Winner
Government or energy-sector clients needing a Northwest-Europe-based AI consultancy Strong Limited Xomnia
Manufacturing or telecom enterprises wanting data pipeline work bundled with agentic AI Strong Limited Xomnia
European healthcare or fintech buyers wanting sector-matched reference contracts Limited Strong Belitsoft
E-learning platforms adding AI tutoring or advisory agents Limited Strong Belitsoft
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Xomnia vs Belitsoft

Xomnia (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A 2025 acquisition (Aurai) grew its specialist headcount to 135+, positioning it as Northwest Europe's leading data and AI consultancy.. It is best for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount..

Belitsoft (3.7/5) is the better choice when european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check.. If your situation matches those criteria, Belitsoft is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Xomnia vs Belitsoft FAQ

Is Xomnia better than Belitsoft?

Xomnia (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Xomnia is better for northwest European enterprises wanting a data-and-AI consultancy with a recent acquisition-driven scale-up in specialist headcount.. Belitsoft is better for european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check..

How do Xomnia and Belitsoft differ in pricing?

Xomnia uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Belitsoft uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Xomnia or Belitsoft?

Belitsoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Xomnia and Belitsoft?

Xomnia's primary differentiator is: a 2025 acquisition (aurai) grew its specialist headcount to 135+, positioning it as northwest europe's leading data and ai consultancy.. Belitsoft's primary differentiator is: two decades of vertical delivery history in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech, with a mostly-eu (poland, latvia) delivery footprint.. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 51–400), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Manufacturing, Financial Services vs Healthcare, Financial Services).

Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.