Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) edges ahead of BotsCrew (3.6/5) overall. Lasting Dynamics is the better choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. BotsCrew is the stronger option for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lasting Dynamics | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| HQ | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain | London, UK |
| Team size | 11–50 | 51–100 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors. | UK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, staff augmentation | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, AWS | Python, LangChain, OpenAI |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare |
Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew: overview
Lasting Dynamics
Lasting Dynamics is an award-winning software development company founded in 2015 by Michele Cimmino, with a core operational hub in Naples, Italy and registered headquarters in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, plus an office in Stavanger, Norway. Its roughly 30–36 person team delivers custom software, AI solutions, SaaS platforms, and mobile applications for clients in 30+ countries. As a Spanish/Italian EU entity, it offers a genuinely Southern European delivery option, distinct from the Poland-heavy cluster of firms on this list.
BotsCrew
BotsCrew is a conversational AI development company founded in 2016, with reported headquarters in London, UK (also San Francisco) and delivery teams in Lviv, Ukraine and Adelaide, Australia, totaling roughly 73 employees. Led by CEO Nazar Hembara and Managing Director Max Gladysh, it has extended its original chatbot-development practice into autonomous, multi-step agentic systems. Its London office gives it a UK legal entity for European clients, while its Lviv delivery team sits outside the EU proper.
Services and capabilities: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
| Capability | Lasting Dynamics | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
| Framework / platform | Lasting Dynamics | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | ✓ |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
| Criterion | Lasting Dynamics | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
| Dimension | Lasting Dynamics | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster, Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | UK and European buyers building autonomous, multi-step conversational agents rather than fixed-tree chatbots, Well-scoped customer-facing agentic dialogue projects for mid-market clients |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew: pros and cons
| Lasting Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Southern European (Spain/Italy) EU delivery base, distinct jurisdiction from the Poland-heavy cluster on this list |
| + | Over a decade of award-winning software development history since 2015 |
| + | Client base spans 30+ countries despite a compact team |
| + | Additional Norwegian office extends its European footprint further north |
| - | Small team (roughly 30–36 people) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Reported headquarters location varies by source (Las Palmas vs. Naples), worth confirming contracting entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| BotsCrew | |
|---|---|
| + | London office gives it a UK legal entity accessible to European clients |
| + | A decade of dedicated conversational AI development history since 2016 |
| + | Founder-led (Nazar Hembara, Max Gladysh) continuity |
| + | Dialogue-design expertise transfers directly into more natural agentic conversation quality |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside strict EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Lviv, Ukraine delivery team sits outside the EU proper — worth confirming per-project data handling |
| - | ~73-person team caps capacity for large or highly parallel enterprise programs |
Who should choose Lasting Dynamics?
Lasting Dynamics is the right choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose BotsCrew?
BotsCrew is the right choice for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems..
A decade of dedicated conversational AI/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue, with a UK legal entity.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lasting Dynamics |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | BotsCrew |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lasting Dynamics (Not published) vs BotsCrew (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | BotsCrew |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
| Use case | Lasting Dynamics fit | BotsCrew fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European buyers building autonomous, multi-step conversational agents rather than fixed-tree chatbots | Limited | Strong | BotsCrew |
| Well-scoped customer-facing agentic dialogue projects for mid-market clients | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. It is best for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
BotsCrew (3.6/5) is the better choice when uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems.. If your situation matches those criteria, BotsCrew is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lasting Dynamics vs BotsCrew FAQ
Is Lasting Dynamics better than BotsCrew?
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lasting Dynamics is better for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. BotsCrew is better for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems..
How do Lasting Dynamics and BotsCrew differ in pricing?
Lasting Dynamics uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. BotsCrew uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lasting Dynamics or BotsCrew?
BotsCrew is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lasting Dynamics and BotsCrew?
Lasting Dynamics's primary differentiator is: a genuinely southern european (spain/italy) delivery base, an alternative eu jurisdiction to the poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. BotsCrew's primary differentiator is: a decade of dedicated conversational ai/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue, with a uk legal entity.. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 51–100), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.