Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) edges ahead of B12 Consulting (3.6/5) overall. Lasting Dynamics is the better choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. B12 Consulting is the stronger option for eU buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian consultancy founded by physics researchers.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Lasting Dynamics | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
| HQ | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain | Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium |
| Team size | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | Buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors. | EU buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian consultancy founded by physics researchers. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, staff augmentation | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, AWS | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting: overview
Lasting Dynamics
Lasting Dynamics is an award-winning software development company founded in 2015 by Michele Cimmino, with a core operational hub in Naples, Italy and registered headquarters in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, plus an office in Stavanger, Norway. Its roughly 30–36 person team delivers custom software, AI solutions, SaaS platforms, and mobile applications for clients in 30+ countries. As a Spanish/Italian EU entity, it offers a genuinely Southern European delivery option, distinct from the Poland-heavy cluster of firms on this list.
B12 Consulting
B12 Consulting was founded in 2012 by a group of PhDs in Physics sharing a passion for complex problem solving, headquartered in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium with an additional Brussels presence, and roughly 35 FTE. It is a services company expert in artificial intelligence, data science, and custom software development, with a technical, research-adjacent culture reflecting its founders' academic backgrounds. As a Belgian EU entity, it offers full EU data residency at a compact, deeply technical headcount.
Services and capabilities: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
| Capability | Lasting Dynamics | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
| Framework / platform | Lasting Dynamics | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
| Criterion | Lasting Dynamics | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Staff augmentation | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
| Dimension | Lasting Dynamics | B12 Consulting |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster, Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | EU buyers wanting a small, technically rigorous Belgian consultancy for a well-scoped project, Complex data-science-adjacent agentic AI problems suited to a research-oriented team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting: pros and cons
| Lasting Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Southern European (Spain/Italy) EU delivery base, distinct jurisdiction from the Poland-heavy cluster on this list |
| + | Over a decade of award-winning software development history since 2015 |
| + | Client base spans 30+ countries despite a compact team |
| + | Additional Norwegian office extends its European footprint further north |
| - | Small team (roughly 30–36 people) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Reported headquarters location varies by source (Las Palmas vs. Naples), worth confirming contracting entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| B12 Consulting | |
|---|---|
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (Belgium), simplifying GDPR compliance for European buyers |
| + | Founded by PhDs in Physics, giving it an unusually research-adjacent technical culture |
| + | Over a decade of continuous operating history since 2012 |
| + | Brussels presence alongside Louvain-la-Neuve headquarters gives access to EU institutional buyers |
| - | Very small team (~35 FTE) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Fewer named large-enterprise case studies than other boutiques on this list |
Who should choose Lasting Dynamics?
Lasting Dynamics is the right choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose B12 Consulting?
B12 Consulting is the right choice for eU buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian consultancy founded by physics researchers..
Founded by PhDs in Physics, giving it a research-adjacent, deeply technical culture uncommon among the boutiques on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lasting Dynamics |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Lasting Dynamics (Not published) vs B12 Consulting (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Lasting Dynamics |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
| Use case | Lasting Dynamics fit | B12 Consulting fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| EU buyers wanting a small, technically rigorous Belgian consultancy for a well-scoped project | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Complex data-science-adjacent agentic AI problems suited to a research-oriented team | Limited | Strong | B12 Consulting |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. It is best for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
B12 Consulting (3.6/5) is the better choice when eU buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian consultancy founded by physics researchers.. If your situation matches those criteria, B12 Consulting is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Lasting Dynamics vs B12 Consulting FAQ
Is Lasting Dynamics better than B12 Consulting?
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Lasting Dynamics is better for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. B12 Consulting is better for eU buyers wanting a small, deeply technical Belgian consultancy founded by physics researchers..
How do Lasting Dynamics and B12 Consulting differ in pricing?
Lasting Dynamics uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. B12 Consulting uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Lasting Dynamics or B12 Consulting?
Lasting Dynamics is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Lasting Dynamics and B12 Consulting?
Lasting Dynamics's primary differentiator is: a genuinely southern european (spain/italy) delivery base, an alternative eu jurisdiction to the poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. B12 Consulting's primary differentiator is: founded by phds in physics, giving it a research-adjacent, deeply technical culture uncommon among the boutiques on this list.. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.