Endava vs onepoint: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.0/5) edges ahead of onepoint (3.7/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. onepoint is the stronger option for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led French IT services firm.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs onepoint: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | onepoint |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2002 |
| HQ | London, UK | Paris, France |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 3,700+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. | French and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led French IT services firm. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, LangChain | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare | Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
Endava vs onepoint: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
onepoint
onepoint is a French IT services company founded in 2002 by David Layani, headquartered in a 4,000 sqm building in Paris's 16th arrondissement, with roughly 3,700 employees. It operates across application development, infrastructure support, and advisory services, applying that broad enterprise practice to agentic AI work as it emerges. As a French-headquartered entity, it offers EU procurement teams a domestic legal entity at a mid-size scale between the largest global SIs and the smaller boutiques on this list.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs onepoint
| Capability | Endava | onepoint |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs onepoint
| Framework / platform | Endava | onepoint |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs onepoint
| Criterion | Endava | onepoint |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs onepoint
| Dimension | Endava | onepoint |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Manufacturing |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | French and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led IT services firm, Buyers wanting a scale between the largest global SIs and the smallest boutiques |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs onepoint: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
| onepoint | |
|---|---|
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (France), simplifying GDPR compliance |
| + | Founder-led (David Layani) continuity since founding in 2002 |
| + | 3,700+ employees gives a scale between boutique and global-SI capacity |
| + | Broad existing practice (application development, infrastructure, advisory) supports agentic work in context |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer addition to a broad IT services portfolio, not the sole focus |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | Fewer named agentic-specific case studies than AI-first specialist competitors |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Who should choose onepoint?
onepoint is the right choice for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led French IT services firm..
A founder-led (David Layani), French-headquartered mid-size IT services firm, sized between the large global SIs and boutique specialists.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Government & Public Sector, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Endava vs onepoint
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | onepoint |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs onepoint (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs onepoint
| Use case | Endava fit | onepoint fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| French and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led IT services firm | Limited | Strong | onepoint |
| Buyers wanting a scale between the largest global SIs and the smallest boutiques | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs onepoint
Endava (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. It is best for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
onepoint (3.7/5) is the better choice when french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led French IT services firm.. If your situation matches those criteria, onepoint is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs onepoint FAQ
Is Endava better than onepoint?
Endava (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. onepoint is better for french and EU enterprises wanting agentic AI from a mid-size, founder-led French IT services firm..
How do Endava and onepoint differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. onepoint uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or onepoint?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and onepoint?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. onepoint's primary differentiator is: a founder-led (david layani), french-headquartered mid-size it services firm, sized between the large global sis and boutique specialists.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 3,700+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Financial Services, Government & Public Sector).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.