Endava vs Netguru: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.0/5) edges ahead of Netguru (3.8/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Netguru is the stronger option for eU buyers wanting design and engineering bundled under a single agentic AI contract from a Polish EU entity.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Netguru: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2008 |
| HQ | London, UK | Poznań, Poland |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 201–500 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. | EU buyers wanting design and engineering bundled under a single agentic AI contract from a Polish EU entity. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, LangChain | Python, LangChain, React |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare |
Endava vs Netguru: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
Netguru
Netguru is a digital product consultancy founded in 2008 and headquartered in Poznań, Poland, with approximately 440–450 employees delivering product design, engineering, and AI/agentic development services. Its contract structure bundles design and engineering under one agreement, and as a Polish EU entity, its default delivery sits fully within EU jurisdiction. Its broader product-consultancy origins mean agentic-specific specialization is less concentrated than at AI-only boutiques on this list.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Netguru
| Capability | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Netguru
| Framework / platform | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Netguru
| Criterion | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Netguru
| Dimension | Endava | Netguru |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | EU buyers wanting a consumer-facing AI agent product with real design investment under one contract, Adding agentic features to an existing digital product Netguru already built |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs Netguru: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
| Netguru | |
|---|---|
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (Poland), simplifying GDPR compliance and data residency |
| + | Product-design-and-engineering discipline means agent interfaces get real UX attention under one contract |
| + | Nearly two decades of operating history since 2008 |
| + | Established digital product consultancy brand recognized beyond just AI work |
| - | Agent-specific specialization is less concentrated than at AI-only boutique competitors |
| - | Product-consultancy pricing tends toward the higher end for smaller, backend-only automation contracts |
| - | Public AI case studies are a smaller share of its portfolio than its broader product design work |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Who should choose Netguru?
Netguru is the right choice for eU buyers wanting design and engineering bundled under a single agentic AI contract from a Polish EU entity..
Bundles product design and engineering under one contract from a fully EU-domiciled Polish entity, avoiding a separate UX vendor.. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Netguru
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Netguru |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Netguru ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Netguru
| Use case | Endava fit | Netguru fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| EU buyers wanting a consumer-facing AI agent product with real design investment under one contract | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Adding agentic features to an existing digital product Netguru already built | Limited | Strong | Netguru |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Netguru
Endava (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. It is best for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
Netguru (3.8/5) is the better choice when eU buyers wanting design and engineering bundled under a single agentic AI contract from a Polish EU entity.. If your situation matches those criteria, Netguru is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Netguru FAQ
Is Endava better than Netguru?
Endava (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Netguru is better for eU buyers wanting design and engineering bundled under a single agentic AI contract from a Polish EU entity..
How do Endava and Netguru differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Netguru uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Netguru?
Netguru is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Netguru?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Netguru's primary differentiator is: bundles product design and engineering under one contract from a fully eu-domiciled polish entity, avoiding a separate ux vendor.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 201–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.