Endava vs Lasting Dynamics: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.0/5) edges ahead of Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Lasting Dynamics is the stronger option for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Lasting Dynamics: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2015 |
| HQ | London, UK | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. | Buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials | Fixed project, staff augmentation |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, LangChain | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
Endava vs Lasting Dynamics: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
Lasting Dynamics
Lasting Dynamics is an award-winning software development company founded in 2015 by Michele Cimmino, with a core operational hub in Naples, Italy and registered headquarters in Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, plus an office in Stavanger, Norway. Its roughly 30–36 person team delivers custom software, AI solutions, SaaS platforms, and mobile applications for clients in 30+ countries. As a Spanish/Italian EU entity, it offers a genuinely Southern European delivery option, distinct from the Poland-heavy cluster of firms on this list.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
| Capability | Endava | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
| Framework / platform | Endava | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
| Criterion | Endava | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials | Fixed project, Staff augmentation |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
| Dimension | Endava | Lasting Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster, Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs Lasting Dynamics: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
| Lasting Dynamics | |
|---|---|
| + | Southern European (Spain/Italy) EU delivery base, distinct jurisdiction from the Poland-heavy cluster on this list |
| + | Over a decade of award-winning software development history since 2015 |
| + | Client base spans 30+ countries despite a compact team |
| + | Additional Norwegian office extends its European footprint further north |
| - | Small team (roughly 30–36 people) caps capacity for large or highly parallel programs |
| - | Reported headquarters location varies by source (Las Palmas vs. Naples), worth confirming contracting entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Who should choose Lasting Dynamics?
Lasting Dynamics is the right choice for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
A genuinely Southern European (Spain/Italy) delivery base, an alternative EU jurisdiction to the Poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Lasting Dynamics |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Lasting Dynamics (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
| Use case | Endava fit | Lasting Dynamics fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| Buyers wanting a Southern European EU jurisdiction outside the more common Eastern European vendor cluster | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Well-scoped custom software and agentic AI projects for a global client base | Limited | Strong | Lasting Dynamics |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Lasting Dynamics
Endava (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. It is best for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
Lasting Dynamics (3.6/5) is the better choice when buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors.. If your situation matches those criteria, Lasting Dynamics is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Lasting Dynamics FAQ
Is Endava better than Lasting Dynamics?
Endava (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Lasting Dynamics is better for buyers wanting a Southern European (Spanish/Italian) EU delivery option outside the Poland-heavy cluster of vendors..
How do Endava and Lasting Dynamics differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Lasting Dynamics uses fixed project, staff augmentation pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Lasting Dynamics?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Lasting Dynamics?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Lasting Dynamics's primary differentiator is: a genuinely southern european (spain/italy) delivery base, an alternative eu jurisdiction to the poland-concentrated firms elsewhere on this list.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.