Endava vs Deviniti: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.0/5) edges ahead of Deviniti (3.9/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Deviniti is the stronger option for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Deviniti: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2004 |
| HQ | London, UK | Wrocław, Poland |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 201–500 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Best for | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. | EU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, LangChain | Python, Java, LangChain |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce |
Endava vs Deviniti: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
Deviniti
Deviniti is a Wrocław, Poland-based software company founded in 2004 by Piotr Dorosz and Jacek Machata, with roughly 260 employees across Europe and North America. Its established Atlassian Marketplace app and consulting business gives European procurement teams a checkable, independently reviewable track record beyond the vendor's self-reported claims. As a Polish company, it sits fully within EU jurisdiction, and its financial-sector origins mean it has existing compliance-aware delivery experience relevant to GDPR-sensitive agentic AI work.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Deviniti
| Capability | Endava | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Deviniti
| Framework / platform | Endava | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Deviniti
| Criterion | Endava | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Deviniti
| Dimension | Endava | Deviniti |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | EU buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace, Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs Deviniti: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
| Deviniti | |
|---|---|
| + | Atlassian Marketplace and partner listings give procurement an independently checkable track record |
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (Poland), avoiding cross-border data-transfer complexity |
| + | Two decades of enterprise systems-integration experience, originally rooted in financial-sector IT |
| + | Founder-led continuity since 2004 provides institutional stability |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer addition to a legacy enterprise-software and Atlassian practice |
| - | Less name recognition in AI-specific European procurement circles compared to AI-first competitors |
| - | Public agentic-specific case studies are limited relative to its Atlassian portfolio |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Who should choose Deviniti?
Deviniti is the right choice for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..
An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully EU-domiciled (Poland).. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Deviniti
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Deviniti |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Deviniti ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Deviniti
| Use case | Endava fit | Deviniti fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| EU buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract | Limited | Strong | Deviniti |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Deviniti
Endava (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. It is best for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
Deviniti (3.9/5) is the better choice when eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. If your situation matches those criteria, Deviniti is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Deviniti FAQ
Is Endava better than Deviniti?
Endava (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Deviniti is better for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..
How do Endava and Deviniti differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Deviniti uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Deviniti?
Deviniti is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Deviniti?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Deviniti's primary differentiator is: an atlassian marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully eu-domiciled (poland).. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 201–500), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Financial Services, Manufacturing).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.