Endava vs Belitsoft: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.0/5) edges ahead of Belitsoft (3.7/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Belitsoft is the stronger option for european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Belitsoft: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2004 |
| HQ | London, UK | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 10,000+ | 51–400 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | UK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology. | European healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check. |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, time & materials | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, OpenAI, LangChain | Python, LangChain, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare | Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS |
Endava vs Belitsoft: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, UK, with over 10,000 employees across 26 locations. It has embedded OpenAI's AI agents directly into its own software delivery workflow, branded as DavaFlow, making it one of the few firms on this list that has publicly documented using agentic AI to redesign its own internal delivery process, not just sell it to clients. As a UK-headquartered, NYSE-listed company, it offers public financial disclosure but sits outside EU jurisdiction post-Brexit for its own corporate entity.
Belitsoft
Belitsoft is a custom software development company founded in 2004 with headquarters in Warsaw, Poland and delivery teams distributed across Poland, Latvia, and Georgia, totaling roughly 130–400 developers, testers, and other specialists depending on the source. Its existing vertical experience in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech gives European buyers in those sectors a directly comparable reference base. Its Poland and Latvia offices sit within the EU; its Georgia office sits outside EU jurisdiction, worth confirming per-project data residency.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Belitsoft
| Capability | Endava | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✓ | ✗ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Belitsoft
| Framework / platform | Endava | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | ✓ | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Belitsoft
| Criterion | Endava | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Belitsoft
| Dimension | Endava | Belitsoft |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS |
| Best use cases | Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally, UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | European healthcare or fintech buyers wanting sector-matched reference contracts, E-learning platforms adding AI tutoring or advisory agents |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
Endava vs Belitsoft: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly documented use of OpenAI's agentic AI in its own internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) |
| + | NYSE-listed with public financial disclosure |
| + | 10,000+ employees across 26 locations gives substantial bench depth |
| + | Quarter-century of digital consultancy history since 2000 |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| - | 26-location scale can mean less senior-architect access than boutique competitors |
| Belitsoft | |
|---|---|
| + | Two decades of vertical delivery experience in healthcare, fintech, and e-learning |
| + | Poland and Latvia delivery centers sit within the EU for data-residency purposes |
| + | Founded 2004 with continuous operating history |
| + | Existing sector expertise helps agentic work meet vertical-specific compliance and workflow needs |
| - | Georgia delivery office sits outside EU jurisdiction — worth confirming which team works on a given project |
| - | Reported employee counts vary widely across sources, worth confirming directly |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer addition to a generalist custom-software practice |
Who should choose Endava?
Endava is the right choice for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial Services, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Healthcare.
Who should choose Belitsoft?
Belitsoft is the right choice for european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check..
Two decades of vertical delivery history in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech, with a mostly-EU (Poland, Latvia) delivery footprint.. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial Services, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Belitsoft
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Belitsoft |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Belitsoft ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Belitsoft
| Use case | Endava fit | Belitsoft fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buyers wanting proof a vendor applies agentic AI to its own delivery process before selling it externally | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| UK and European enterprises needing large-scale dedicated-team engagements | Strong | Limited | Endava |
| European healthcare or fintech buyers wanting sector-matched reference contracts | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| E-learning platforms adding AI tutoring or advisory agents | Limited | Strong | Belitsoft |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Belitsoft
Endava (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. A named, OpenAI-powered internal delivery methodology (DavaFlow) — evidence the firm applies agentic AI to its own software delivery, not just client work.. It is best for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology..
Belitsoft (3.7/5) is the better choice when european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check.. If your situation matches those criteria, Belitsoft is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Belitsoft FAQ
Is Endava better than Belitsoft?
Endava (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava is better for uK and European enterprises wanting a vendor that has publicly documented using agentic AI on its own internal delivery methodology.. Belitsoft is better for european healthcare, fintech, and e-learning buyers wanting sector-specific reference contracts to check..
How do Endava and Belitsoft differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated team, retainer, time & materials pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Belitsoft uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Belitsoft?
Belitsoft is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Belitsoft?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a named, openai-powered internal delivery methodology (davaflow) — evidence the firm applies agentic ai to its own software delivery, not just client work.. Belitsoft's primary differentiator is: two decades of vertical delivery history in e-learning, healthcare, and fintech, with a mostly-eu (poland, latvia) delivery footprint.. They also differ in team size (10,000+ vs 51–400), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Technology & SaaS vs Healthcare, Financial Services).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.