Deviniti vs BotsCrew: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Deviniti (3.9/5) edges ahead of BotsCrew (3.6/5) overall. Deviniti is the better choice for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. BotsCrew is the stronger option for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Deviniti vs BotsCrew: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Deviniti | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2004 | 2016 |
| HQ | Wrocław, Poland | London, UK |
| Team size | 201–500 | 51–100 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | EU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record. | UK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Python, Java, LangChain | Python, LangChain, OpenAI |
| Industries served | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare |
Deviniti vs BotsCrew: overview
Deviniti
Deviniti is a Wrocław, Poland-based software company founded in 2004 by Piotr Dorosz and Jacek Machata, with roughly 260 employees across Europe and North America. Its established Atlassian Marketplace app and consulting business gives European procurement teams a checkable, independently reviewable track record beyond the vendor's self-reported claims. As a Polish company, it sits fully within EU jurisdiction, and its financial-sector origins mean it has existing compliance-aware delivery experience relevant to GDPR-sensitive agentic AI work.
BotsCrew
BotsCrew is a conversational AI development company founded in 2016, with reported headquarters in London, UK (also San Francisco) and delivery teams in Lviv, Ukraine and Adelaide, Australia, totaling roughly 73 employees. Led by CEO Nazar Hembara and Managing Director Max Gladysh, it has extended its original chatbot-development practice into autonomous, multi-step agentic systems. Its London office gives it a UK legal entity for European clients, while its Lviv delivery team sits outside the EU proper.
Services and capabilities: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
| Capability | Deviniti | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| Coding agents | ✗ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
| Framework / platform | Deviniti | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | N/A |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | ✓ |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
| Criterion | Deviniti | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
| Dimension | Deviniti | BotsCrew |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS | Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | EU buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace, Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract | UK and European buyers building autonomous, multi-step conversational agents rather than fixed-tree chatbots, Well-scoped customer-facing agentic dialogue projects for mid-market clients |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Deviniti vs BotsCrew: pros and cons
| Deviniti | |
|---|---|
| + | Atlassian Marketplace and partner listings give procurement an independently checkable track record |
| + | Fully EU-domiciled (Poland), avoiding cross-border data-transfer complexity |
| + | Two decades of enterprise systems-integration experience, originally rooted in financial-sector IT |
| + | Founder-led continuity since 2004 provides institutional stability |
| - | Agentic AI is a newer addition to a legacy enterprise-software and Atlassian practice |
| - | Less name recognition in AI-specific European procurement circles compared to AI-first competitors |
| - | Public agentic-specific case studies are limited relative to its Atlassian portfolio |
| BotsCrew | |
|---|---|
| + | London office gives it a UK legal entity accessible to European clients |
| + | A decade of dedicated conversational AI development history since 2016 |
| + | Founder-led (Nazar Hembara, Max Gladysh) continuity |
| + | Dialogue-design expertise transfers directly into more natural agentic conversation quality |
| - | UK-headquartered, so post-Brexit it sits outside strict EU jurisdiction for its own corporate entity |
| - | Lviv, Ukraine delivery team sits outside the EU proper — worth confirming per-project data handling |
| - | ~73-person team caps capacity for large or highly parallel enterprise programs |
Who should choose Deviniti?
Deviniti is the right choice for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..
An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully EU-domiciled (Poland).. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce.
Who should choose BotsCrew?
BotsCrew is the right choice for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems..
A decade of dedicated conversational AI/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue, with a UK legal entity.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Deviniti |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Deviniti |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Deviniti ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs BotsCrew (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Deviniti |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
| Use case | Deviniti fit | BotsCrew fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU buyers wanting a vendor whose track record can be independently checked via a third-party marketplace | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Workflow-integration agents for teams already running Atlassian tooling under an existing contract | Strong | Limited | Deviniti |
| UK and European buyers building autonomous, multi-step conversational agents rather than fixed-tree chatbots | Limited | Strong | BotsCrew |
| Well-scoped customer-facing agentic dialogue projects for mid-market clients | Limited | Strong | BotsCrew |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Deviniti vs BotsCrew
Deviniti (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Agent Development projects. An Atlassian Marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully EU-domiciled (Poland).. It is best for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record..
BotsCrew (3.6/5) is the better choice when uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems.. If your situation matches those criteria, BotsCrew is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Deviniti vs BotsCrew FAQ
Is Deviniti better than BotsCrew?
Deviniti (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Deviniti is better for eU buyers on the Atlassian ecosystem wanting a vendor with an independently checkable marketplace/partner track record.. BotsCrew is better for uK and European buyers wanting a compact, conversational-AI-native team to build customer-facing agentic dialogue systems..
How do Deviniti and BotsCrew differ in pricing?
Deviniti uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). BotsCrew uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Deviniti or BotsCrew?
Deviniti is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Deviniti and BotsCrew?
Deviniti's primary differentiator is: an atlassian marketplace and partner track record independently checkable outside the vendor's own claims, fully eu-domiciled (poland).. BotsCrew's primary differentiator is: a decade of dedicated conversational ai/chatbot delivery experience applied specifically to autonomous, multi-step agentic dialogue, with a uk legal entity.. They also differ in team size (201–500 vs 51–100), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial Services, Manufacturing vs Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.